A note on products of sequential fans

Two posts (the previous post and this post) are devoted to discussing the behavior of countable tightness in taking Cartesian products. The previous post shows that countable tightness behaves well in the product operation if the spaces are compact. In this post, we step away from the orderly setting of compact spaces. We examine the behavior of countable tightness in product of sequential fans. In this post, we show that countable tightness can easily be destroyed when taking products of sequential fans. Due to the combinatorial nature of sequential fans, the problem of determining the tightness of products of fans is often times a set-theoretic problem. In many instances, it is hard to determine the tightness of a product of two sequential fans without using extra set theory axioms beyond ZFC. The sequential fans is a class of spaces that have been studied extensively and are involved in the solutions of many problems that were seemingly unrelated. For one example, see [3].

For a basic discussion of countable tightness, see these previous post on the notion of tightness and its relation with free sequences. Also see chapter a-4 on page 15 of [4].

____________________________________________________________________

Sequential fans

Let S be a non-trivial convergent sequence along with its limit point. For convenience, let \displaystyle S=\left\{0 \right\} \cup \left\{1, 2^{-1}, 3^{-1}, 4^{-1}, \cdots \right\}, considered as a subspace of the Euclidean real line. Let \kappa be a cardinal number. The set \kappa is usually taken as the set of all the ordinals that precede \kappa. The set \omega is the first infinite ordinal, or equivalently the set of all non-negative integers. Let \omega^\kappa be the set of all functions from \kappa into \omega.

There are several ways to describe a sequential fan. One way is to describe it as a quotient space. The sequential fan S(\kappa) is the topological sum of \kappa many copies of the convergent sequence S with all non-isolated points identified as one point that is called \infty. To make the discussion easier to follow, we also use the following formulation of S(\kappa):

    \displaystyle S(\kappa)=\left\{\infty \right\} \cup (\kappa \times \omega)

In this formulation, every point is \kappa \times \omega is isolated and an open neighborhood of the point \infty is of the form:

    \displaystyle B_f=\left\{\infty \right\} \cup \left\{(\alpha,n) \in \kappa \times \omega: n \ge f(\alpha) \right\} where f \in \omega^\kappa.

According to the definition of the open neighborhood B_f, the sequence (\alpha,0), (\alpha,1), (\alpha,2),\cdots converges to the point \infty for each \alpha \in \kappa. Thus the set (\left\{\alpha \right\} \times \omega) \cup \left\{\infty \right\} is a homeomorphic copy of the convergent sequence S. The set \left\{\alpha \right\} \times \omega is sometimes called a spine. Thus the space S(\kappa) is said to be the sequential fan with \kappa many spines.

The point \infty is the only non-isolated point in the fan S(\kappa). The set \mathcal{B}=\left\{B_f: f \in \omega^\kappa \right\} is a local base at the point \infty. The base \mathcal{B} is never countable except when \kappa is finite. Thus if \kappa is infinite, the fan S(\kappa) can never be first countable. In particular, for the fan S(\omega), the character at the point \infty is the cardinal number \mathfrak{d}. See page 13 in chapter a-3 of [4]. This cardinal number is called the dominating number and is introduced below in the section “The bounding number”. This is one indication that the sequential fan is highly dependent on set theory. It is hard to pinpoint the character of S(\omega) at the point \infty. For example, it is consistent with ZFC that \mathfrak{d}=\omega_1. It is also consistent that \mathfrak{d}>\omega_1.

Even though the sequential fan is not first countable, it has a relatively strong convergent property. If \infty \in \overline{A} and \infty \notin A where A \subset S(\kappa), then infinitely many points of A are present in at least one of the spine \left\{\alpha \right\} \times \omega (if this is not true, then \infty \notin \overline{A}). This means that the sequential fan is always a Frechet space. Recall that the space Y is a Frechet space if for each A \subset Y and for each x \in \overline{A}, there exists a sequence \left\{x_n \right\} of points of A converging to x.

Some of the convergent properties weaker than being a first countable space are Frechet space, sequential space and countably tight space. Let's recall the definitions. A space X is a sequential space if A \subset X is a sequentially closed set in X, then A is a closed set in X. The set A is sequentially closed in X if this condition is satisfied: if the sequence \left\{x_n \in A: n \in \omega \right\} converges to x \in X, then x \in A. A space X is countably tight (have countable tightness) if for each A \subset X and for each x \in \overline{A}, there exists a countable B \subset A such that x \in \overline{B}. See here for more information about these convergent properties. The following shows the relative strength of these properties. None of the implications can be reversed.

    First countable space \Longrightarrow Frechet space \Longrightarrow Sequential space \Longrightarrow Countably tight space

____________________________________________________________________

Examples

The relatively strong convergent property of being a Frechet space is not preserved in products or squares of sequential fans. We now look at some examples.

Example 1
Consider the product space S(\omega) \times S where S is the convergent sequence defined above. The first factor is Frechet and the second factor is a compact metric space. We show that S(\omega) \times S is not sequential. To see this, consider the following subset A of S(\omega) \times S:

    \displaystyle A_f=\left\{(x,n^{-1}) \in S(\omega) \times S: n \in \omega \text{ and } x=(n,f(n)) \right\} \ \forall \ f \in \omega^\omega

    \displaystyle A=\bigcup_{f \in \omega^\omega} A_f

It follows that (\infty,0) \in \overline{A}. Furthermore, no sequence of points of A can converge to the point (\infty,0). To see this, let a_n \in A for each n. Consider two cases. One is that some spine \left\{m \right\} \times \omega contains the first coordinate of a_n for infinitely many n \in \omega. The second is the opposite of the first – each spine \left\{m \right\} \times \omega contains the first coordinate of a_n for at most finitely many n. Either case means that there is an open set containing (\infty,0) that misses infinitely many a_n. Thus the sequence a_n cannot converge to (\infty,0).

Let A_1 be the set of all sequential limits of convergent sequences of points of A. With A \subset A_1, we know that (\infty,0) \in \overline{A_1} but (\infty,0) \notin A_1. Thus A_1 is a sequentially closed subset of S(\omega) \times S that is not closed. This shows that S(\omega) \times S is not a sequential space.

The space S(\omega) \times S is an example of a space that is countably tight but not sequential. The example shows that the product of two Frechet spaces does not even have to be sequential even when one of the factors is a compact metric space. The next example shows that the product of two sequential fans does not even have to be countably tight.

Example 2
Consider the product space S(\omega) \times S(\omega^\omega). We show that it is not countably tight. To this end, consider the following subset A of S(\omega) \times S(\omega^\omega).

    \displaystyle S(\omega)=\left\{\infty \right\} \cup (\omega \times \omega)

    \displaystyle S(\omega^\omega)=\left\{\infty \right\} \cup (\omega^\omega \times \omega)

    \displaystyle A_f=\left\{(x,y) \in S(\omega) \times S(\omega^\omega): x=(n,f(n)) \text{ and } y=(f,j)  \right\} \ \forall \ f \in \omega^\omega

    \displaystyle A=\bigcup_{f \in \omega^\omega} A_f

It follows that (\infty,\infty) \in \overline{A}. We show that for any countable C \subset A, the point (\infty,\infty) \notin \overline{C}. Fix a countable C \subset A. We can assume that C=\bigcup_{i=1}^\infty A_{f_i}. Now define a function g \in \omega^\omega by a diagonal argument as follows.

Define g(0) such that g(0)>f_0(0). For each integer n>0, define g(n) such that g(n)>\text{max} \{ \ f_n(0),f_n(1),\cdots,f_n(n) \ \} and g(n)>g(n-1). Let O=B_g \times S(\omega^\omega). The diagonal definition of g ensures that O is an open set containing (\infty,\infty) such that O \cap C=\varnothing. This shows that the space S(\omega) \times S(\omega^\omega) is not countably tight.

Example 3
The space S(\omega_1) \times S(\omega_1) is not countably tight. In fact its tightness character is \omega_1. This fact follows from Theorem 1.1 in [2].

____________________________________________________________________

The set-theoretic angle

Example 2 shows that S(\omega) \times S(\omega^\omega) is not countably tight even though each factor has the strong property of a Frechet space with the first factor being a countable space. The example shows that Frechetness behaves very badly with respect to the product operation. Is there an example of \kappa>\omega such that S(\omega) \times S(\kappa) is countably tight? In particular, is S(\omega) \times S(\omega_1) countably tight?

First off, if Continuum Hypothesis (CH) holds, then Example 2 shows that S(\omega) \times S(\omega_1) is not countably tight since the cardinality of \omega^{\omega} is \omega_1 under CH. So for S(\omega) \times S(\omega_1) to be countably tight, extra set theory assumptions beyond ZFC will have to be used (in fact the extra axioms will have to be compatible with the negation of CH). In fact, it is consistent with ZFC for S(\omega) \times S(\omega_1) to be countably tight. It is also consistent with ZFC for t(S(\omega) \times S(\omega_1))=\omega_1. We point out some facts from the literature to support these observations.

Consider S(\omega) \times S(\kappa) where \kappa>\omega_1. For any regular cardinal \kappa>\omega_1, it is possible that S(\omega) \times S(\kappa) is countably tight. It is also possible for the tightness character of S(\omega) \times S(\kappa) to be \kappa (of course in a different model of set theory). Thus it is hard to pin down the tightness character of the product S(\omega) \times S(\kappa). It all depends on your set theory. In the next section, we point out some facts from the literature to support these observations.

Example 3 points out that the tightness character of S(\omega_1) \times S(\omega_1) is \omega_1, i.e. t(S(\omega_1) \times S(\omega_1))=\omega_1 (this is a fact on the basis of ZFC only). What is t(S(\omega_2) \times S(\omega_2)) or t(S(\kappa) \times S(\kappa)) for any \kappa>\omega_1? The tightness character of S(\kappa) \times S(\kappa) for \kappa>\omega_1 also depends on set theory. We also give a brief explanation by pointing out some basic information from the literature.

____________________________________________________________________

The bounding number

The tightness of the product S(\omega) \times S(\kappa) is related to the cardinal number called the bounding number denoted by \mathfrak{b}.

Recall that \omega^{\omega} is the set of all functions from \omega into \omega. For f,g \in \omega^{\omega}, define f \le^* g by the condition: f(n) \le g(n) for all but finitely many n \in \omega. A set F \subset \omega^{\omega} is said to be a bounded set if F has an upper bound according to \le^*, i.e. there exists some f \in \omega^{\omega} such that g \le^* f for all g \in F. Then F \subset \omega^{\omega} is an unbounded set if it is not bounded. To spell it out, F \subset \omega^{\omega} is an unbounded set if for each f \in \omega^{\omega}, there exists some g \in F such that g \not \le^* f.

Furthermore, F \subset \omega^{\omega} is a dominating set if for each f \in \omega^{\omega}, there exists some g \in F such that f \le^* g. Define the cardinal numbers \mathfrak{b} and \mathfrak{d} as follows:

    \displaystyle \mathfrak{b}=\text{min} \left\{\lvert F \lvert: F \subset \omega^{\omega} \text{ is an unbounded set} \right\}

    \displaystyle \mathfrak{d}=\text{min} \left\{\lvert F \lvert: F \subset \omega^{\omega} \text{ is a dominating set} \right\}

The cardinal number \mathfrak{b} is called the bounding number. The cardinal number \mathfrak{d} is called the dominating number. Note that continuum \mathfrak{c}, the cardinality of \omega^{\omega}, is an upper bound of both \mathfrak{b} and \mathfrak{d}, i.e. \mathfrak{b} \le \mathfrak{c} and \mathfrak{d} \le \mathfrak{c}. How do \mathfrak{b} and \mathfrak{d} relate? We have \mathfrak{b} \le \mathfrak{d} since any dominating set is also an unbounded set.

A diagonal argument (similar to the one in Example 2) shows that no countable F \subset \omega^{\omega} can be unbounded. Thus we have \omega < \mathfrak{b} \le \mathfrak{d} \le \mathfrak{c}. If CH holds, then we have \omega_1 = \mathfrak{b} = \mathfrak{d} = \mathfrak{c}. On the other hand, it is also consistent that \omega < \mathfrak{b} < \mathfrak{d} \le \mathfrak{c}.

We now relate the bounding number to the tightness of S(\omega) \times S(\kappa). The following theorem is from Theorem 1.3 in [3].

Theorem 1 – Theorem 1.3 in [3]
The following conditions hold:

  • For \omega \le \kappa <\mathfrak{b}, the space S(\omega) \times S(\kappa) is countably tight.
  • The tightness character of S(\omega) \times S(\mathfrak{b}) is \mathfrak{b}, i.e. t(S(\omega) \times S(\mathfrak{b}))=\mathfrak{b}.

Thus S(\omega) \times S(\kappa) is countably tight for any uncountable \kappa <\mathfrak{b}. In particular if \omega_1 <\mathfrak{b}, then S(\omega) \times S(\omega_1) is countably tight. According to Theorem 5.1 in [6], this is possible.

Theorem 2 – Theorem 5.1 in [6]
Let \tau and \lambda be regular cardinal numbers such that \omega_1 \le \tau \le \lambda. It is consistent with ZFC that \mathfrak{b}=\mathfrak{d}=\tau and \mathfrak{c}=\lambda.

Theorem 2 indicates that it is consistent with ZFC that the bounding number \mathfrak{b} can be made to equal any regular cardinal number. In the model of set theory in which \omega_1 <\mathfrak{b}, S(\omega) \times S(\omega_1) is countably tight. Likewise, in the model of set theory in which \omega_1 < \kappa <\mathfrak{b}, S(\omega) \times S(\kappa) is countably tight.

On the other hand, if the bounding number is made to equal an uncountable regular cardinal \kappa, then t(S(\omega) \times S(\kappa))=\kappa. In particular, t(S(\omega) \times S(\omega_1))=\omega_1 if \mathfrak{b}=\omega_1.

The above discussion shows that the tightness of S(\omega) \times S(\kappa) is set-theoretic sensitive. Theorem 2 indicates that it is hard to pin down the location of the bounding number \mathfrak{b}. Choose your favorite uncountable regular cardinal, there is always a model of set theory in which \mathfrak{b} is your favorite uncountable cardinal. Then Theorem 1 ties the bounding number to the tightness of S(\omega) \times S(\kappa). Thus the exact value of the tightness character of S(\omega) \times S(\kappa) depends on your set theory. If your favorite uncountable regular cardinal is \omega_1, then in one model of set theory consistent with ZFC, t(S(\omega) \times S(\omega_1))=\omega (when \omega_1 <\mathfrak{b}). In another model of set theory, t(S(\omega) \times S(\omega_1))=\omega_1 (when \omega_1 =\mathfrak{b}).

One comment about the character of the fan S(\omega) at the point \infty. As indicated earlier, the character at \infty is the dominating number \mathfrak{d}. Theorem 2 tells us that it is consistent that \mathfrak{d} can be any uncountable regular cardinal. So for the fan S(\omega), it is quite difficult to pinpoint the status of a basic topological property such as character of a space. This is another indication that the sequential fan is highly dependent on additional axioms beyond ZFC.

____________________________________________________________________

The collectionwise Hausdorff property

Now we briefly discuss the tightness of t(S(\kappa) \times S(\kappa)) for any \kappa>\omega_1. The following is Theorem 1.1 in [2].

Theorem 3 – Theorem 1.1 in [2]
Let \kappa be any infinite regular cardinal. The following conditions are equivalent.

  • There exists a first countable < \kappa-collectionwise Hausdorff space which fails to be a \kappa-collectionwise Hausdorff space.
  • t(S(\kappa) \times S(\kappa))=\kappa.

The existence of the space in the first condition, on the surface, does not seem to relate to the tightness character of the square of a sequential fan. Yet the two conditions were proved to be equivalent [2]. The existence of the space in the first condition is highly set-theory sensitive. Thus so is the tightness of the square of a sequential fan. It is consistent that a space in the first condition exists for \kappa=\omega_2. Thus in that model of set theory t(S(\omega_2) \times S(\omega_2))=\omega_2. It is also consistent that there does not exist a space in the first condition for \kappa=\omega_2. Thus in that model, t(S(\omega_2) \times S(\omega_2))<\omega_2. For more information, see [3].

____________________________________________________________________

Remarks

Sequential fans and their products are highly set-theoretic in nature and are objects that had been studied extensively. This is only meant to be a short introduction. Any interested readers can refer to the small list of articles listed in the reference section and other articles in the literature.

____________________________________________________________________

Exercise

Use Theorem 3 to show that t(S(\omega_1) \times S(\omega_1))=\omega_1 by finding a space X that is a first countable < \omega_1-collectionwise Hausdorff space which fails to be a \omega_1-collectionwise Hausdorff space.

For any cardinal \kappa, a space X is \kappa-collectionwise Hausdorff (respectively < \kappa-collectionwise Hausdorff) if for any closed and discrete set A \subset X with \lvert A \lvert \le \kappa (repectively \lvert A \lvert < \kappa), the points in A can be separated by a pairwise disjoint family of open sets.

____________________________________________________________________

Reference

  1. Bella A., van Mill J., Tight points and countable fan-tightness, Topology Appl., 76, (1997), 1-27.
  2. Eda K., Gruenhage G., Koszmider P., Tamano K., Todorčeviće S., Sequential fans in topology, Topology Appl., 67, (1995), 189-220.
  3. Eda K., Kada M., Yuasa Y., Tamano K., The tightness about sequential fans and combinatorial properties, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 49 (1), (1997), 181-187.
  4. Hart, K. P., Nagata J. I., Vaughan, J. E., editors, Encyclopedia of General Topology, First Edition, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V, Amsterdam, 2003.
  5. LaBerge T., Landver A., Tightness in products of fans and psuedo-fans, Topology Appl., 65, (1995), 237-255.
  6. Van Douwen, E. K., The Integers and Topology, Handbook of Set-Theoretic Topology (K. Kunen and J. E. Vaughan, eds), Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, (1984) 111-167.

.

____________________________________________________________________
\copyright \ 2015 \text{ by Dan Ma}

Several ways to define countably tight spaces

This post is an introduction to countable tight and countably generated spaces. A space being a countably tight space is a convergence property. The article [1] lists out 8 convergence properties. The common ones on that list include Frechet space, sequential space, k-space and countably tight space, all of which are weaker than the property of being a first countable space. In this post we discuss several ways to define countably tight spaces and to discuss its generalizations.

____________________________________________________________________

Several definitions

A space X is countably tight (or has countable tightness) if for each A \subset X and for each x \in \overline{A}, there is a countable B \subset A such that x \in \overline{B}. According to this Wikipedia entry, a space being a countably generated space is the property that its topology is generated by countable sets and is equivalent to the property of being countably tight. The equivalence of the two definitions is not immediately clear. In this post, we examine these definitions more closely. Theorem 1 below has three statements that are equivalent. Any one of the three statements can be the definition of countably tight or countably generated.

Theorem 1
Let X be a space. The following statements are equivalent.

  1. For each A \subset X, the set equality (a) holds.\text{ }
    • \displaystyle \overline{A}=\cup \left\{\overline{B}: B \subset A  \text{ and } \lvert B \lvert \le \omega \right\} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (a)

  2. For each A \subset X, if condition (b) holds,
      For all countable C \subset X, C \cap A is closed in C \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (b)

    then A is closed.

  3. For each A \subset X, if condition (c) holds,
      For all countable B \subset A, \overline{B} \subset A \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (c)

    then A is closed.

Statement 1 is the definition of a countably tight space. The set inclusion \supset in (a) is always true. We only need to be concerned with \subset, which is the definition of countable tightness given earlier.

Statement 2 is the definition of a countably generated space according to this Wikipedia entry. This definition is in the same vein as that of k-space (or compactly generated space). Note that a space X is a k-space if Statement 2 holds when “countable” is replaced with “compact”.

Statement 3 is in the same vein as that of a sequential space. Recall that a space X is a sequential space if A \subset X is a sequentially closed set then A is closed. The set A is a sequentially closed set if the sequence x_n \in A converges to x \in X, then x \in A (in other words, for any sequence of points of A that converges, the limit must be in A). If the sequential limit in the definition of sequential space is relaxed to be just topological limit (i.e. accumulation point), then the resulting definition is Statement 3. Thus Statement 3 says that for any countable subset B of A, any limit point (i.e. accumulation point) of B must be in A. Thus any sequential space is countably tight. In a sequential space, the closed sets are generated by taking sequential limit. In a space defined by Statement 3, the closed sets are generated by taking closures of countable sets.

All three statements are based on the countable cardinality and have obvious generalizations by going up in cardinality. For any set A \subset X that satisfies condition (c) in Statement 3 is said to be an \omega-closed set. Thus for any cardinal number \tau, the set A \subset X is a \tau-closed set if for any B \subset A with \lvert B \lvert \le \tau, \overline{B} \subset A. Condition (c) in Statement 3 can then be generalized to say that if A \subset X is a \tau-closed set, then A is closed.

The proof of Theorem 1 is handled in the next section where we look at the generalizations of all three statements and prove their equivalence.

____________________________________________________________________

Generalizations

The definition in Statement 1 in Theorem 1 above can be generalized as a cardinal function called tightness. Let X be a space. By t(X) we mean the least infinite cardinal number \tau such that the following holds:

    For all A \subset X, and for each x \in \overline{A}, there exists B \subset A with \lvert B \lvert \le \tau such that x \in \overline{B}.

When t(X)=\omega, the space X is countably tight (or has countable tightness). In keeping with the set equality (a) above, the tightness t(X) can also be defined as the least infinite cardinal \tau such that for any A \subset X, the following set equality holds:

    \displaystyle \overline{A}=\cup \left\{\overline{B}: B \subset A  \text{ and } \lvert B \lvert \le \tau \right\} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (\alpha)

Let \tau be an infinite cardinal number. To generalize Statement 2, we say that a space X is \tau-generated if the following holds:

    For each A \subset X, if the following condition holds:

      For all C \subset X with \lvert C \lvert \le \tau, the set C \cap A is closed in C \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (\beta)

    then A is closed.

To generalize Statement 3, we say that a set A \subset X is \tau-closed if for any B \subset A with \lvert B \lvert \le \tau, \overline{B} \subset A. A generalization of Statement 3 is that

    For any A \subset X, if A \subset X is a \tau-closed set, then A is closed .\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (\chi)

Theorem 2
Let X be a space. Let \tau be an infinite cardinal. The following statements are equivalent.

  1. t(X)=\tau.
  2. The space X is \tau-generated.
  3. For each A \subset X, if A \subset X is a \tau-closed set, then A is closed.

Proof of Theorem 2
1 \rightarrow 2
Suppose that (2) does not hold. Let A \subset X be such that the set A satisfies condition (\beta) and A is not closed. Let x \in \overline{A}-A. By (1), the point x belongs to the right hand side of the set equality (\alpha). Choose B \subset A with \lvert B \lvert \le \tau such that x \in \overline{B}. Let C=B \cup \left\{x \right\}. By condition (\beta), C \cap A=B is closed in C. This would mean that x \in B and hence x \in A, a contradiction. Thus if (1) holds, (2) must holds.

2 \rightarrow 3
Suppose (3) does not hold. Let A \subset X be a \tau-closed set that is not a closed set in X. Since (2) holds and A is not closed, condition (\beta) must not hold. Choose C \subset X with \lvert C \lvert \le \tau such that B=C \cap A is not closed in C. Choose x \in C that is in the closure of C \cap A but is not in C \cap A. Since A is \tau-closed, \overline{B}=\overline{C \cap A} \subset A, which implies that x \in A, a contradiction. Thus if (2) holds, (3) must hold.

3 \rightarrow 1
Suppose (1) does not hold. Let A \subset X be such that the set equality (\alpha) does not hold. Let x \in \overline{A} be such that x does not belong to the right hand side of (\alpha). Let A_0=\overline{A}-\left\{x \right\}. Note that the set A_0 is \tau-closed. By (3), A_0 is closed. Furthermore x \in \overline{A_0}, leading to x \in A_0=\overline{A}-\left\{x \right\}, a contradiction. So if (3) holds, (1) must hold. \blacksquare

Theorem 1 obviously follows from Theorem 2 by letting \tau=\omega. There is another way to characterize the notion of tightness using the concept of free sequence. See the next post.

____________________________________________________________________

Examples

Several elementary convergence properties have been discussed in a series of blog posts (the first post and links to the other are found in the first one). We have the following implications and none is reversible.

    First countable \Longrightarrow Frechet \Longrightarrow Sequential \Longrightarrow k-space

Where does countable tightness place in the above implications? We discuss above that

    Sequential \Longrightarrow countably tight.

How do countably tight space and k-space compare? It turns out that none implies the other. We present some supporting examples.

Example 1
The Arens’ space is a canonical example of a sequential space that is not a Frechet space. A subspace of the Arens’ space is countably tight and not sequential. The same subspace is also not a k-space. There are several ways to represent the Arens’ space, we present the version found here.

Let \mathbb{N} be the set of all positive integers. Define the following:

    \displaystyle V_{i,j}=\left\{\biggl(\frac{1}{i},\frac{1}{k} \biggr): k \ge j \right\} for all i,j \in \mathbb{N}

    V=\bigcup_{i \in \mathbb{N}} V_{i,j}

    \displaystyle H=\left\{\biggl(\frac{1}{i},0 \biggr): i \in \mathbb{N} \right\}

    V_i=V_{i,1} \cup \left\{ x \right\} for all i \in \mathbb{N}

Let Y=\left\{(0,0) \right\} \cup H \cup V. Each point in V is an isolated point. Open neighborhoods at (\frac{1}{i},0) \in H are of the form:

    \displaystyle \left\{\biggl(\frac{1}{i},0 \biggr) \right\} \cup V_{i,j} for some j \in \mathbb{N}

The open neighborhoods at (0,0) are obtained by removing finitely many V_i from Y and by removing finitely many isolated points in the V_i that remain. The open neighborhoods just defined form a base for a topology on the set Y, i.e. by taking unions of these open neighborhoods, we obtain all the open sets for this space. The space Y can also be viewed as a quotient space (discussed here).

The space Y is a sequential space that is not Frechet. The subspace Z=\left\{(0,0) \right\} \cup V is not sequential. Since Y is a countable space, the space Z is by default a countably tight space. The space Z is also not an k-space. These facts are left as exercises below.

Example 2
Consider the product space X=\left\{0,1 \right\}^{\omega_1}. The space X is compact since it is a product of compact spaces. Any compact space is a k-space. Thus X is a k-space (or compactly generated space). On the other hand, X is not countably tight. Thus the notion of k-space and the notion of countably tight space do not relate.

____________________________________________________________________

Remarks

There is another way to characterize the notion of tightness using the concept of free sequence. See the next post.

The notion of tightness had been discussed in previous posts. One post shows that the function space C_p(X) is countably tight when X is compact (see here). Another post characterizes normality of X \times \omega_1 when X is compact (see here)

____________________________________________________________________

Exercises

Exercise 1
This is to verify Example 1. Verify that

  • The space Y is a sequential space that is not Frechet.
  • Z=\left\{(0,0) \right\} \cup V is not sequential.
  • The space Z is not an k-space.

Exercise 2
Verify that any compact space is a k-space. Show that the space X in Example 2 is not countably tight.

____________________________________________________________________

Reference

  1. Gerlits J., Nagy Z., Products of convergence properties, Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, Vol 23, No 4 (1982), 747–756

____________________________________________________________________
\copyright \ 2015 \text{ by Dan Ma}

Sequentially compact spaces, II

All spaces under consideration are Hausdorff. Countably compactness and sequentially compactness are notions related to compactness. A countably compact space is one in which every countable open cover has a finite subcover, or equivalently, every countably infinite subset has a limit point. For a space X, the point p \in X is a limit point of A \subset X if every open subset of X containing p contains a point of A distinct from p. On the other hand, a space X is sequentially compact if every sequence \left\{x_n:n=1,2,3,\cdots\right\} of points of X has a subsequence that converges. Any sequentially compact space is countably compact. The converse is not true. The product space 2^I where I=[0,1] is not sequentially compact (see Sequentially compact spaces, I) . However, for sequential spaces (first countable spaces in particular), the notion of sequentially compactness and countably compactness are equivalent. For previous discussion in this blog about sequential spaces, see the links below.

Lemma
Any countably compact space that is countable in size is metrizable and thus first countable.

Proof. Let X be countably compact such that \lvert X \lvert=\aleph_0. Then X is compact (any Lindelof countably compact space is compact). In any countable space, the set of all singleton sets is a countable network. Any compact Hausdorff space with a countable network is metrizable and thus first countable. See Spaces With Countable Network. \blacksquare

Theorem
Let X be a sequential space. Then X is countably compact if and only if X is sequentially compact.

Proof. The direction \Leftarrow always holds without the space being sequential.

\Rightarrow Suppose X is countably compact. Suppose that X is not sequentially compact. Then there is a sequence \left\{x_n\right\} of points of X with no convergent subsequence. Let A be the set of all terms in this sequence, i.e. A=\left\{x_n:n=1,2,3,\cdots\right\}. Note that A is sequentially closed. Since X is sequential, A is closed in X. As a closed subset of a countably compact space, A is countably compact. By the lemma, A is first countable. Since A is an infinite compact space, A has a non-isolated point x. This means some sequence of points of A converges to x, contradicting the assumption that \left\{x_n\right\} has no convergent subsequence. Therefore X must be sequentially compact. \blacksquare

Previous posts on sequential spaces and k-spaces:
Sequential spaces, I
Sequential spaces, II
Sequential spaces, III
Sequential spaces, IV
Sequential spaces, V
k-spaces, I
k-spaces, II
A note about the Arens’ space
An observation about sequential spaces

Reference

  1. Engelking, R. General Topology, Revised and Completed edition, 1989, Heldermann Verlag, Berlin.
  2. Henkel, D. Solution to Monthly Problem 5698, American Mathematical Monthly 77, p. 896, 1970
  3. Willard, S., General Topology, 1970, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

An observation about sequential spaces

This post is about an observation about sequential spaces. In a sequential space, non-trivial convergent sequences abound. Thus in the extreme case of there being no trivial convergent convergent sequences, the space in question must not be sequential. Specifically we observe that if X is a Hausdorff sequential space and if p \in X is a non-isolated point (i.e. the singleton set \left\{p\right\} is not open), there is a convergent sequence p_n of points of X-\left\{p\right\} such that p_n \mapsto p. Thus it is necessary condition that in a sequential space, there exist non-trivial convergent sequences at every non-isolated point. We present examples showing that this condition is not a sufficient condition for a space being sequential. As the following examples show, the property that there are non-trivial convergent sequences at every non-isolated is a rather weak property.

The first example is from the problem section of Mathematical Monthly in 1970 (see [2]). Let \mathbb{R} be the real line and let \mathbb{P} be the set of all irrational numbers. Let \mathbb{Q}=\mathbb{R}-\mathbb{P}. Let X=\mathbb{R} and define a new topology on X by calling a subset U \subset X open if and only if U=W-H where W is a usual open subset of the real line and H is a subset of \mathbb{P} that is at most countable. This new topology on the real line is finer than the Euclidean topology. Thus X is a Hausdorff space. Every point of X is a non-isolated point and is the the sequential limit of a sequence of rational numbers, satisfying the condition that every non-isolated point is the sequential limit of a non-trivial convergent sequence.

In the topology for X, every countably infinite subset of the set \mathbb{P} is closed in X. Thus no sequence of points of \mathbb{P} can converge to a point not in \mathbb{P}. Therefore \mathbb{P} is sequentially closed and non-closed in X, making X not a sequential space.

Not only that every countably infinite subset of \mathbb{P} is closed in X, every countably infinite subset of \mathbb{P} is relatively discrete. Then it follows that for every compact K \subset X, K \cap \mathbb{P} is finite (and is thus closed in K). Thus X is also not a k-space.

Another example is that of a product space. Any uncountable product where each factor has at least two points is not sequential. This follows from the fact that 2^{\omega_1} is not sequential (see Sequential spaces, IV). Furthermore, in any product space with infinitely many factors each of which has at least two points, every point is the sequential limit of a non-trivial convergent sequence. Thus any product space with uncountably many factors, each of which has at least two points, is another example of a non-sequential space where there are non-trivial convergent sequences at every point.

Previous posts on sequential spaces and k-spaces:
Sequential spaces, I
Sequential spaces, II
Sequential spaces, III
Sequential spaces, IV
Sequential spaces, V
k-spaces, I
k-spaces, II
A note about the Arens’ space

Reference

  1. Engelking, R. General Topology, Revised and Completed edition, 1989, Heldermann Verlag, Berlin.
  2. Henkel, D. Solution to Monthly Problem 5698, American Mathematical Monthly 77, p. 896, 1970
  3. Willard, S., General Topology, 1970, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

A note about the Arens’ space

The Arens’ space is a canonical example of a sequential space that is not a Frechet space. It also has a subspace that is not sequential (thus the notion of being a sequential is not hereditary). We show that any space that is sequential but not Frechet contains a copy of the Arens’ space. For previous discussion on sequential spaces and Frechet spaces, see the links at the end of this post. Also see [1] and [2].

Let \omega be the set of all nonnegative integers. Let \mathbb{N} be the set of all positive integers. In one formulation, the Arens’ space is the set X=\left\{\infty\right\} \cup \mathbb{N} \cup (\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}) with the open neighborhoods defined by:

  • The points in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} are isolated;
  • The neighborhoods at each n \in \mathbb{N} are of the form B_{n,m}=\left\{n\right\} \cup \left\{(n,j) \in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}:j \ge m\right\} for some m \in \mathbb{N};
  • The neighborhoods at \infty are obtained by removing from X finitely many B_{n,1} and by removing finitely many isolated points in each of the remaining B_{n,1}.

Another formulation is that of a quotient space. For each n \in \omega, let K_n=\left\{x_{n,j}:j \in \mathbb{N}\right\} \cup \left\{y_n\right\} be a convergent sequence such that y_n is the limit. Let G be a topological sum of the convergent sequences K_n. We then identify \left\{x_{0,j},y_j\right\} for each j \in \mathbb{N}. The Arens’ space is the resulting quotient space and let Y denote this space (in the literature S_2 is used). Note that the Arens’ space has been previously defined in this blog (see An example of a quotient space, II). Note that the quotient space Y is topologically identical to X. In the remainder of this note, we work with X in discussing the Arens’ space.

The Arens’ space is sequential since it is a quotient space of a first countable space. The subspace \left\{\infty\right\} \cup (\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}) is not sequential, proving that the Arens’ space is not a Frechet space.

We now show that any sequential space that is not Frechet contains a copy of the Arens’ space. We have the following theorem.

Theorem
Let W be a sequential space. Then W is Frechet if and only W does not contain a copy of the Arens’ space.

Proof
\Longrightarrow This direction is clear since the Frechet property is hereditary.

\Longleftarrow For any T \subset W, let T^s be the set of limits of sequences of points of T. Suppose W is not Frechet. Then for some A \subset W, there exists x \in \overline{A} such that x \notin A^s. Since A^s is non-closed in W and since W is sequential, there is a sequence w_n of points of A^s converging to z_0 \notin A^s. We can assume that w_n \notin A for all but finitely many n (otherwise z_0 \in A^s). Thus without loss of generality, assume w_n \notin A for all n.

For each n \in \mathbb{N}, there is a sequence z_{n,j} of points of A converging to w_n. It is OK to assume that all w_n are distinct and all z_{n,j} are distinct across the two indexes. Let W_0=\left\{z_0\right\} \cup W_1 \cup W_2 where W_1=\left\{w_n: n \in \mathbb{N}\right\} and W_2=\left\{z_{n,j}:n,j \in \mathbb{N}\right\}. Then W_0 is a homeomorphic copy of the Arens’ space. \blacksquare

Remark
The above theorem is not valid outside of sequential spaces. Let Z be a countable space with only one non-isolated point where Z is not sequential (for example, the subspace Z=\left\{\infty\right\} \cup (\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}) of the Arens’ space). Clearly Z contains no copy of the Arens’ space. Yet Z is not Frechet (it is not even sequential).

Previous posts on sequential spaces and Frechet spaces:
Sequential spaces, I
Sequential spaces, II
Sequential spaces, III
Sequential spaces, IV
Sequential spaces, V
k-spaces, I
k-spaces, II

Reference

  1. Engelking, R. General Topology, Revised and Completed edition, 1989, Heldermann Verlag, Berlin.
  2. Willard, S., General Topology, 1970, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

k-spaces, II

A space X is a k-space if for each A \subset X, A is closed in X if and only if K \cap A is closed in K for all compact K \subset X. A space X is a sequential space if for each A \subset X, A is closed in X if and only if A is a sequentially closed set in X. A set A \subset X is sequentially closed in the space X if whenever we have x_n \in A and the sequence x_n converges to x \in X, we have x \in A. A set A \subset X is sequentially open in X if X-A is sequentially closed in X. In both of these definitions, we can replace “closed” with “open” and the “only if” part of the definition always hold. Thus in working with these definitions, we only need to be concerned with the “if” part. Every sequential space is a k-space. The converse does not hold. In this short note, we show that the converse holds if every point in the space is a G_\delta-set. This is a basic fact about k-spaces. For other basic facts on k-spaces and sequential spaces, see the following:

Sequential spaces, I
Sequential spaces, II
Sequential spaces, III
Sequential spaces, IV
Sequential spaces, V
k-spaces, I

In a given space X, W \subset X is a G_\delta-set in X if W=\bigcap \limits_{i=1}^\infty U_i where each U_i is open in X, i.e. W is the intersection of countably many open sets. A point x \in X is a G_\delta-set in X if the singleton \left\{x\right\} is the intersection of countably many open subsets of X. It is a well known fact in general topology that in a compact Hausdorff space X, if x \in X is a G_\delta-set in X, then there is a countable local base at x. It follows that if every point of a compact Hausdorff space X is a G_\delta-set in X, then X is first countable (see The cardinality of compact first countable spaces, II).

Theorem
Let X be a space in which every point is a G_\delta-set in X. Then if X is a k-space then X is a sequential space.

Proof. Suppose A \subset X is not closed in X. We show that A is not sequentially closed in X, i.e. there is a sequence x_n \in A such that x_n \mapsto x \in X and x \notin A.

Since X is a k-space and A is not closed, there is a compact K \subset X such that K \cap A is not closed in K. Every point of K is a G_\delta-set in X and thus a G_\delta-set in K. It follows that K is first countable.

Let x \in \overline{K \cap A} such that x \notin A (the closure is taken in K). Since K is first countable, there is a sequence x_n \in K \cap A such that x_n \mapsto x. This means A is not sequentially closed in X. \blacksquare

Sequential spaces, V

In the previous post Sequential spaces, IV, we show that the uncountable product of sequential spaces is not sequential (e.g. the product 2^{\omega_1} is not sequential). What is more remarkable is that the product of two sequential spaces needs not be sequential. We present an example of a first countable space and a Frechet space whose product is not a k-space (thus not sequential). For the previous discussion on this blog on sequential spaces and k-spaces, see the links at the end of this post.

Let \mathbb{R} be the real line and let \mathbb{N} be the set of all positive integers. Let X be the space \mathbb{R}-\left\{1,\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{3},\cdots\right\} with the topology inherited from the usual topology on the real line. Let Y=\mathbb{R} with the positive integers identified as one point (call this point p). We claim that X \times Y is not a k-space and thus not a sequential space. To this end, we define a non-closed A \subset X \times Y such that K \cap A is closed in K for all compact K \subset X \times Y.

Let A=\bigcup \limits_{i=1}^\infty A_i where for each i \in \mathbb{N}, the set A_i is defined by the following:

    \displaystyle A_i =\left\{\biggl(\frac{1}{i}+\frac{a_i}{j},i+\frac{0.5}{j} \biggr) \in X \times Y:j \in \mathbb{N}\right\}

where \displaystyle  a_i=\biggl(\frac{1}{i}-\frac{1}{i+1} \biggr) 10^{-i}.

Clearly A is not closed as (0,p) \in \overline{A}-A. In fact in the product space X \times Y, the point (0,p) is the only limit point of the set A. Another observation is that for each n \in \mathbb{N}, (0,p) is not a limit point of \bigcup \limits_{i=1}^n A_i. Furthermore, if z_i \in A_i for each i \in S where S is an infinite subset of \mathbb{N}, then (0,p) is not a limit point of \left\{z_i:i \in S\right\}. It follows that no infinite subset of A is compact. Consequently, K \cap A is finite for each compact K \subset X \times Y. Thus X \times Y is not a k-space. To see that X \times Y is not sequential directly, observe that A is sequentially closed.

Previous posts on sequential spaces and k-spaces